Services / Generative Engine Optimization

Generative Engine Optimization

When somebody asks ChatGPT or Perplexity who to hire, it comes back with three or four names. We work out why it picks those and get you into the set.

AT A GLANCE
Best for Brands missing from AI recommendations
First results 8 to 12 weeks
Works with AEO, AI SEO
Pricing Fixed per phase, quoted after the audit
Book a free audit
THE PROBLEM

Being findable is not the same as being recommended

A buyer who used to type a query into Google now asks an assistant to shortlist for them. The assistant comes back with three or four names and a sentence on each. That shortlist is assembled from what the model has read about you across the web, not from where you rank, and most companies have never once checked what it says.

The uncomfortable part is that you can rank first for every keyword you care about and still be absent from the shortlist. Models lean on what third parties say about you, on whether your category and your claims are described consistently wherever they appear, and on whether your own pages state plainly what you sell and who for. Fixing it is reputation work and structural work at the same time.

You cannot be picked from a list you are not on.

WHAT IS INCLUDED

Six things we do

01

Prompt testing

We run the prompts your buyers use across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude, and record who gets named and in what terms.

02

Citation audit

Which third-party pages the models draw on for your category, where competitors turn up and you do not, and which of those we can realistically influence.

03

Source placement

Getting you accurately represented on the directories, comparisons and roundups the models keep quoting back.

04

Claim consistency

The same description of what you do, who for, and with what proof, everywhere a model might read it. Contradictions are what get you dropped.

05

On-site evidence

Pages that state your category, your clients and your results in language a model can lift without having to guess at it.

06

Re-testing on a cycle

Model answers drift, and they change without telling anyone. We re-run the same prompts monthly and report the movement, including when it goes against us.

3 of 4

Assistants naming the client after one programme

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE

Progress is counted in mentions, not positions

There is no ranking report for this. The honest measure is how often the assistants name you for the prompts that matter, which is why we baseline those prompts before starting and re-run exactly the same ones afterwards.

Figures are illustrative of typical programme results.

WORKS WELL WITH

Answer Engine Optimization

The same structural groundwork, aimed at the one direct answer Google gives rather than what an assistant recommends.

Learn more →

AI SEO

The ranking and technical layer underneath. Models read the pages that crawlers can reach.

Learn more →

Website Development

If a model cannot render or parse your pages, the evidence sitting on them does not count for anything.

Learn more →

Find out what the assistants say about you today.

The free audit runs your own prompts across the major assistants and shows you the answers, alongside your rankings and where your paid spend is going.